The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
72
Page
1 of 2
Released decisions72 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ292246 →Jul 1, 2026 · San FranciscoPanel decision
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The Appeals Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration and deferred issuance of a final decision pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
The WCJ's November 23, 2022 Findings of Fact were rescinded and the matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the decision after reconsideration.
The Appeals Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the Findings and Order of March 4, 2026, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the decision.
Petitions for Reconsideration granted; November 21, 2025 Findings and Award affirmed except amended Finding of Fact No. 14 and amended award of attorney's fees to lien claimant.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration is granted. Final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits and consideration of the entire record.
Reconsideration granted; prior Findings and Order dated July 29, 2025 rescinded; new Findings substituted; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings on medical necessity of requested treatment.
The Appeals Board denied defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's Findings and Award that the utilization review decision was untimely and the requested inpatient rehabilitation treatment was reasonable and medically necessary.
Reconsideration granted to amend findings to confirm the November 16, 2023 UR determination was valid and final; otherwise, the May 28, 2025 WCJ decision is affirmed, ordering defendant to comply with the UR determination and admitting trial exhibits into evidence.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of the May 8, 2025 Findings of Fact and Orders is granted; final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
The Appeals Board grants applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and defers final decision after reconsideration pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
Petition for Reconsideration is granted; the December 7, 2023 Findings of Fact, Order; Opinion on Decision is rescinded and substituted with findings that defendant failed to meet its burden to show a change of circumstances warranting discontinuation of inpatient treatment; all other issues are deferred.
The WCAB granted the Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the finding allowing the deposition of Dr. Lisa Pitino, and otherwise affirmed the October 3, 2023 Findings and Award allowing the deposition of the person most knowledgeable at Ericsson regarding earnings and earning capacity.
Petition for Reconsideration denied by the Appeals Board panel on November 27, 2023, affirming the WCJ's finding that Applicant failed to prove medical necessity of the disputed treatment in the October 28, 2021 RFA.
Petition for reconsideration granted; July 3, 2023 Findings and Award amended to find defendant did not timely defer utilization review upon receiving two medical reports with requests for authorization.
Petition for Reconsideration is denied, affirming the WCJ's findings that the utilization review determination was untimely and that the requested outpatient rehabilitation program is reasonable and necessary.
The WCAB rescinded the February 7, 2022 Findings and Award and substituted new findings denying the September 13, 2021 Request for Authorization and finding no requirement for utilization review; applicant is not entitled to the Functional Restoration Program at defendant's expense.