The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Petitions for Reconsideration granted; prior FA&O rescinded; new Joint FA&O substituted finding one cumulative injury through July 28, 2013, with date of injury August 12, 2013.
Granting defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinding the WCJ's FA&O, and issuing a new decision deferring permanent disability determination pending further record development.
The WCAB panel denied the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and upheld the WCJ's Findings and Award that Applicant sustained an industrial injury to the left knee arising out of and in the course of employment and needs further medical treatment.
Findings of Fact and Award of December 22, 2020 affirmed except amended to address the Employment Development Department lien on temporary disability benefits.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant's psychiatric injury was caused by a sudden and extraordinary employment condition and thus not barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d).