ADJ13448644 — California WCAB decision

What the panel ordered

Petition for Reconsideration denied

Petition for Reconsideration filed by Defendant after WCJ found industrial injury to Applicant; WCAB panel denies reconsideration and adopts WCJ report

Read the official decision →

What was disputed, and how it came out

Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.

AOE/COEApplicant prevailedleft shoulder

The WCJ found the applicant's testimony credible and relied on the PQME Dr. Wolfson's report, which matched the applicant's injury mechanism, to find an industrial injury despite inconsistent histories in other reports.

From the decision · page 5Applicant's testimony matches the mechanism of injury in Dr. Wolfson's report as well as in Dr. Nkadi's reporting. Although there are other mechanisms of injury noted in other reports this does not completely undermine applicant's credibility. Based upon Dr. Wolfsons reporting and applicant's testimony it is found that applicant sustained an industrial injury to her left shoulder on July 12, 2020.

The facts that decided it

What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.

What the panel did with the medical opinions

The role the physician served, and the weight the opinion carried. Physicians are named here as the decision names them; we do not score them.

QMERelied upon

Diagnosed industrially related rotator cuff tear based on applicant's history; maintained opinion after reviewing medical reports; deferred to trier of fact on injury occurrence.

The WCJ relied on Dr. Wolfson's report matching the applicant's credible testimony to find industrial injury.

From the decision · page 5The parties utilized Dr. Wolfson as the PQME. Dr. Wolfson examined applicant on 2/23/21. Applicant gave a history of the injury occurring while she was pulling on a fifth wheel gear. The report describes that the fifth wheel gear was not working properly so she needed to do it manually which required applicant to pull with both hands on a long metal stick. Dr. Wolfson diagnosed her with an industrially related rotator cuff tear. At that time Dr. Wolfson had not reviewed any medical reports and based his opinion on applicant's statements. Dr. Wolfson later reviewed several medical reports and continued to opine that applicant's claim of injury was industrially related. Defendant deposed Dr. Wolfson on 9/24/21 and pointed out the various histories as noted above. Dr. Wolfson deferred to the trier of fact if the incident occurred as alleged.

otherPartially credited

Reported injury to shoulder while trying to pull a lever to detach trailer, consistent with applicant's testimony.

Supports the finding of industrial injury consistent with applicant's testimony.

From the decision · page 5Applicant presented at Wellspace Health on 8/10/20. The report indicates an injury to the right arm. (Exhibit E) On 9/21/20 she was seen by Dr. Nkadi; it was reported that applicant injured her shoulder while she was trying to pull a lever to detach the trailer that was attached to the truck. Applicant returned to Wellspace on 10/16/20, it is reported that applicant injured her left arm while lifting a heavy object. On 11/30/20 the records note that applicant injured her left shoulder when she was carrying cargo out of a truck.

ADJ13448644 · May 31, 2022

What the panel ordered

What was disputed, and how it came out

The facts that decided it

Your case already resembles someone else’s. Find whose.

What the panel did with the medical opinions

The rules the panel named

What proof carried it

About this page