The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
11
Page
1 of 1
Released decisions11 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ2755694 →Oct 15, 2025 · Los AngelesPanel decision
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Findings, Award, and Order affirmed except amended to find QME Dr. Wieseltier's reports not substantial evidence on apportionment; permanent disability issue deferred; applicant entitled to future medical care; issue of treatment outside MPN deferred; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings
The Appeals Board rescinded the May 6, 2004 WCJ decision and remanded the matter to the WCJ to allow the defendant a reasonable time to initiate the AME/QME procedure and for the WCJ to redetermine the applicant's entitlement to right shoulder surgery after completion of the AME/QME procedure.
WCJ's July 21, 2004 Findings and Award and Order rescinded; matter remanded to trial level for further proceedings and new decision consistent with en banc opinionp. 13
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision except it rescinded the appointment of Dr. Angerman as a medical evaluator and returned the matter to the trial level for further development of the medical record from Drs. Sobol and Berman.
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that the applicant could select a new treating physician and was entitled to the recommended further medical treatment.