The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
99
Page
2 of 2
Released decisions99 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ12250535 →Nov 27, 2023 · Long BeachPanel decision
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Order denying the medical necessity of the requested Temperpedic adjustable king size bed and denied the Applicant's Petition for Reconsideration.
Petition for reconsideration granted; WCJ's finding that defendant did not timely deny the RFA affirmed; issue of whether requested surgery and MRI are reasonably necessary medical treatment deferred for further development of the record; matter returned to WCJp. 2
The WCAB rescinded the February 7, 2022 Findings and Award and substituted new findings denying the September 13, 2021 Request for Authorization and finding no requirement for utilization review; applicant is not entitled to the Functional Restoration Program at defendant's expense.
The Appeals Board granted defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the January 21, 2022 Findings and Order, and substituted new findings that applicant was properly notified of the MPN, did not establish refusal or neglect of medical treatment, and is not entitled to treat outside the MPN at employer expense.
Findings and Order issued November 15, 2019, rescinded; new decision finds all UR decisions timely, denies penalties under Labor Code section 5814 and attorney's fees under section 5814.5; awards medical treatment to cure or relieve injury effects.
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's Findings and Orders of May 10, 2021, struck the reporting and deposition transcripts of Dr. Lawrence R. Miller as inadmissible for violation of Labor Code section 4628, and ordered issuance of a replacement QME panel. The issue of the specialty of the replacement panel was deferred to the trial level.
Findings of Fact and Orders issued by the WCJ on August 10, 2020 are affirmed except amended to one finding that applicant did not show entitlement to treat outside the MPN.
Findings and Award issued by the WCJ on December 1, 2020 is rescinded and the matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The WCAB denied the Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's Findings that the employer did not neglect or refuse to provide timely medical treatment within the MPN.
WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's decision denying the petition for reconsideration and confirming reimbursement to CIGA for bill review and utilization review expenses as part of medical treatment costs.
The Joint Findings and Award of October 10, 2019 is affirmed in its entirety, including denial of additional medical mileage reimbursement and affirmation of penalties for unreasonable delay in payment.
The WCAB affirms the WCJ's Findings of Fact, Award, Order and Opinion on Decision issued February 13, 2020, denying the requested right knee surgery treatment as not established medically necessary.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's order requiring applicant to produce Social Security Disability documentation relevant to SIBTF's section 4753 credit claim, but amended the order to clarify the method and scope of discovery.
Denial of New Age Imaging, Inc.'s petition for costs affirmed; lien reinstated due to no formal dismissal; New Age must pay lien activation fee if lien pursued
The en banc decision of April 20, 2011, holding that non-MPN medical reports are inadmissible where unauthorized treatment is obtained outside a validly established and properly noticed MPN, is affirmed. Petition for reconsideration by applicant is denied. Petition for reconsideration/removal by Saldivar is dismissed.
The Findings and Award of July 29, 2010, are rescinded and the matter is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The October 18, 2006 Finding and Order is affirmed, allowing defendant to require applicant to obtain medical treatment within its Medical Provider Network regardless of the date of injury or award.
The Appeals Board vacated the order granting reconsideration, granted defendant's petition for removal, and returned the matter to the trial level for an expedited hearing on defendant's Petition for Order to Restore Medical Control.