The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Findings of Fact and Orders of March 25, 2024, rescinded; new Findings of Fact and Order issued finding defendant failed to meet burden of proof on going and coming rule; other issues deferred.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Petition for removal granted to correct clerical errors and amend the order to protect applicant's privacy; otherwise, the Finding and Orders are affirmed
Reconsideration granted to amend findings to confirm the November 16, 2023 UR determination was valid and final; otherwise, the May 28, 2025 WCJ decision is affirmed, ordering defendant to comply with the UR determination and admitting trial exhibits into evidence.
The WCAB rescinded the May 9, 2022 Findings & Order and substituted a new order preserving the finding of injury and finding that Dr. Ponton was a treating physician to whom Labor Code section 4062.3 does not apply. Dr. Ponton shall continue as the medical-legal neuropsychological evaluator.
The WCAB panel denied Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's award for further and ongoing medical treatment at the Centre for Neuro Skills.
The Petition for Reconsideration filed by Defendant was denied, affirming the WCJ's Findings of Fact and Order that the defendant must continue to authorize medical treatment at the Centre for Neuro Skills unless a material change in applicant's condition or circumstance is established.