What the panel ordered
Order granting Petition for Reconsideration vacated; Petition for Reconsideration dismissed
Petition for Reconsideration granted then withdrawn by petitioner, leading to dismissal of the Petition and vacating of the order granting reconsideration
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Petitioner withdrew the Petition for Reconsideration, so the Board vacated the order granting reconsideration and dismissed the Petition without addressing the merits.
From the decision · page 1We previously granted the Petition for Reconsideration to further study the factual and legal issues in this case. The Petition for Reconsideration of the decision issued on December 17, 2020 has been withdrawn by petitioner. Therefore, we will vacate our order granting reconsideration and the Petition will be dismissed. We do not address the merits of the Petition since it has been withdrawn.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Petitioner withdrew the Petition for Reconsideration
Favours Defendant prevailed
This withdrawal led to the dismissal of the Petition and vacating of the order granting reconsideration, ending further review of the merits.
From the decision · page 1We previously granted the Petition for Reconsideration to further study the factual and legal issues in this case. The Petition for Reconsideration of the decision issued on December 17, 2020 has been withdrawn by petitioner. Therefore, we will vacate our order granting reconsideration and the Petition will be dismissed. We do not address the merits of the Petition since it has been withdrawn.
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.