What the panel ordered
Further briefing allowed; final decision pending after briefing period
Petition for Reconsideration granted; further briefing ordered on impact of Atlanta Falcons v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Gandy) (2025) on the issues raised
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The issue is whether subdivisions (c) and (d) apply despite subject-matter jurisdiction under subdivision (a) based on regular employment with the Raiders during the injurious exposure period, requiring further briefing due to the Gandy decision.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant had regular employment with the Oakland Raiders during the injurious exposure period but not during the last year of his professional career
This fact is central to determining whether Labor Code section 3600.5, subdivisions (c) and (d) apply to the claim despite subject-matter jurisdiction under subdivision (a).