What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as untimely.
Petition for Reconsideration filed May 8, 2025, after the WCJ's January 30, 2025 Order dismissing Petitions to Reopen; petition found untimely and dismissed.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition was filed more than 25 days after the WCJ's order and beyond any allowed extension, making it untimely and subject to dismissal.
From the decision · page 3The petition in this matter was filed on May 8, 2025. This was more than 25 days after the service of the WCJ's January 30, 2025 Order and beyond whatever extension of time, if any, the petitioner might have been entitled to under WCAB Rule 10600. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as untimely as it was filed later than the date it was due.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The petition for reconsideration was filed on May 8, 2025, more than 25 days after the WCJ's January 30, 2025 Order dismissing Petitions to Reopen.