What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
From the decision · page 1Lien Claimant True Scan petitioned for reconsideration of the Findings of Fact and Order issued by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in this matter on May 14, 2020. In that decision, the WCJ found that Lien Claimant, True Scan, did not meet their burden of proof regarding the reasonableness of their charges and therefore failed to establish that they are entitled to recover any additional payments by defendant in this matter.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Lien claimant True Scan did not meet burden of proof on reasonableness of charges in WCJ decision dated May 14, 2020.
Favours Defendant prevailed
This finding led to denial of additional payments to True Scan initially.
From the decision · page 1Lien Claimant True Scan petitioned for reconsideration of the Findings of Fact and Order issued by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in this matter on May 14, 2020. In that decision, the WCJ found that Lien Claimant, True Scan, did not meet their burden of proof regarding the reasonableness of their charges and therefore failed to establish that they are entitled to recover any additional payments by defendant in this matter.