What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as successive and improper.
Applicant filed a successive Petition for Reconsideration which was dismissed as improper because the prior petition was not prevailed upon and no new aggrievement was shown.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition was dismissed because the applicant failed to show new aggrievement after a prior petition for reconsideration was denied, making the successive petition improper.
From the decision · page 1On January 21, 2021, applicant, in pro per, filed 71 pages of largely unintelligible handwritten notes which we will treat as a Petition for Reconsideration of our June 24, 2019 Opinion and Order Dismissing Petition for Reconsideration and Dismissing Petition for Removal.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant filed a successive petition for reconsideration after a prior petition was denied.