What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration is DENIEDp. 2
Lien claimant Professional Interpreting filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the WCJ's May 19, 2022 Findings of Fact dismissing its lien pursuant to Labor Code section 4903.05(c)(3). The WCJ issued a Report and Recommendation that the petition be denied. The Appeals Board reviewed the petition and the WCJ's report.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Lien claimant did not comply with Lab. Code, § 4903.05(c)(3) and the distinction between filing and activation fee does not exclude compliance per Ida Montelongo.
From the decision · page 3Petitioner contends that the WCJ erred in finding that: - a) Professional Interpreting’s lien was dismissed pursuant to Lab. Code, § 4903.05(c)(3).
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.