What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied.
Petition for Reconsideration filed by lien claimant WSPT Network was considered and denied by the WCAB panel, adopting and incorporating the WCJ's report.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Petitioner WSPT Network failed to prove it was the owner of the lien as required by the statute, lacking evidence of a contract with the actual medical provider Advanced Dynamic Therapies.
From the decision · page 4It is clear that WSPT Network itself was not the actual provider of medical services here despite the contrary representation on the lien itself. That entity was Advanced Dynamic Therapies.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Petitioner WSPT Network did not provide the medical services but only billed for them, lacking a contract with the actual provider Advanced Dynamic Therapies.
Favours Defendant prevailed