What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as it challenges a non-final order; Petition for Removal denied for failure to demonstrate irreparable harm, significant prejudice, or inadequacy of reconsideration as a remedy.
Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant's attorney challenging an order taking the matter off calendar; WCJ recommended dismissal of the petition as the order was non-final and denial of removal petition for failure to show irreparable harm or significant prejudice.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition was dismissed because it challenged a non-final order taking the matter off calendar, which is not subject to reconsideration under the law.
From the decision · page 7Accordingly, we dismiss applicant's Petition for Reconsideration as applicant seeks reconsideration of a non-final order taking this matter off calendar. We treat the petition as one seeking removal and deny removal.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.