What the panel ordered
Petition for Removal dismissed as untimely
Petition for Removal filed untimely beyond 25 days allowed after service of WCJ's October 29, 2020 Order Suspending Action on Third Petition for Second ADJ Number
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition was filed more than 25 days after service of the WCJ's order, beyond the allowed filing period, making it untimely and subject to dismissal.
From the decision · page 1The petition in this matter was filed on January 11, 2021. This was more than 25 days after the service of the WCJ's October 29, 2020 Order Suspending Action on Third Petition for Second ADJ Number and beyond whatever extension of time, if any, the petitioner might have been entitled to under WCAB Rule 10600.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Petition for Removal was filed on January 11, 2021, more than 25 days after service of the WCJ's October 29, 2020 order