What the panel ordered
Opinion and Order Granting Reconsideration dated July 2, 2024 vacated; Petition for Reconsideration dismissed
Petition for Reconsideration filed May 3, 2024, deferred for further review, then withdrawn by applicant on January 15, 2026
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold July 2, 2024.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant withdrew the Petition for Reconsideration, leading to dismissal and vacatur of the prior order granting reconsideration.
From the decision · page 2On January 15, 2026, applicant filed a petition seeking to withdraw her pending Petition for Reconsideration.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant filed a Petition for Reconsideration on May 3, 2024.
Favours neutral
Initiated the reconsideration process which was later withdrawn.
From the decision · page 3IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that applicant's Petition for Reconsideration, filed May 3, 2024, is DISMISSED.
Applicant filed a petition to withdraw the pending Petition for Reconsideration on January 15, 2026.
Favours Defendant prevailed
Led to dismissal of the Petition and vacatur of the prior order granting reconsideration.
From the decision · page 2On January 15, 2026, applicant filed a petition seeking to withdraw her pending Petition for Reconsideration.
The rules the panel named
Authorities as the decision cited them, with how this panel applied each one.
California Labor Code
Labor Code section 5900 et seq.
Applied to the Petition for Reconsideration procedure and dismissal.
From the decision · page 2On January 15, 2026, applicant filed a petition seeking to withdraw her pending Petition for Reconsideration.
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.