What the panel ordered
The WCAB granted the Petition for Reconsideration, affirmed the Findings of Fact & Order except to defer the issues of neurological and circadian system injuries, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings.
Applicant sought reconsideration of the Findings of Fact & Order issued by the WCJ on June 15, 2022, which found injury AOE/COE to hands, knees, and right ankle but deferred neurological and circadian system injury issues; the WCAB granted reconsideration to defer those issues and return the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The WCAB found that the issues of injury to the neurological system in the form of tremors and to the circadian system in the form of a sleep disorder were not properly tried at the expedited hearing and deferred these issues for further proceedings.
From the decision · page 4In light of the fact that the issues submitted for decision included issues not properly tried at an expedited hearing, it is appropriate that the issues of whether applicant sustained an industrial injury to her neurological system in the form of tremors and/or to her circadian system in the form of a sleep disorder be deferred.
The WCAB deferred the issues of compensability of psychiatric injury and temporary disability pending further medical reporting from Dr. Marcia G. Lamm and Dr. Douglas W. Larson for causation discussion.
From the decision · page 4The disputed issues of compensability of injury to the psychiatric system and entitlement to temporary disability based thereon is deferred pending further medical reporting from both Marcia G. Lamm, Ph.D., and Douglas W. Larson, Ph.D., for discussion of causation in accordance with Rolda v. Pitney Bowes. Inc. (2001) 66 Cal. Comp. Cases 241, 247 (Appeals Board en banc); the issues of whether applicant sustained compensable injuries to her neurological system and/or her circadian system are deferred.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The expedited hearing was not appropriate for deciding the issues of neurological and circadian system injuries.
Favours Applicant prevailed
This procedural issue led to deferral of these injury issues for further proceedings.
From the decision · page 4In light of the fact that the issues submitted for decision included issues not properly tried at an expedited hearing, it is appropriate that the issues of whether applicant sustained an industrial injury to her neurological system in the form of tremors and/or to her circadian system in the form of a sleep disorder be deferred.
What the panel did with the medical opinions
The role the physician served, and the weight the opinion carried. Physicians are named here as the decision names them; we do not score them.
Medical reporting from Dr. Larson is required for further discussion of causation regarding psychiatric injury and temporary disability.
From the decision · page 4The disputed issues of compensability of injury to the psychiatric system and entitlement to temporary disability based thereon is deferred pending further medical reporting from both Marcia G. Lamm, Ph.D., and Douglas W. Larson, Ph.D., for discussion of causation in accordance with Rolda v. Pitney Bowes. Inc. (2001) 66 Cal. Comp. Cases 241, 247 (Appeals Board en banc); the issues of whether applicant sustained compensable injuries to her neurological system and/or her circadian system are deferred.
Medical reporting from Dr. Lamm is required for further discussion of causation regarding psychiatric injury and temporary disability.
From the decision · page 4The disputed issues of compensability of injury to the psychiatric system and entitlement to temporary disability based thereon is deferred pending further medical reporting from both Marcia G. Lamm, Ph.D., and Douglas W. Larson, Ph.D., for discussion of causation in accordance with Rolda v. Pitney Bowes. Inc. (2001) 66 Cal. Comp. Cases 241, 247 (Appeals Board en banc); the issues of whether applicant sustained compensable injuries to her neurological system and/or her circadian system are deferred.
The rules the panel named
Authorities as the decision cited them, with how this panel applied each one.
Labor Code Section 5502(b)
Expedited hearing procedures under Labor Code Section 5502(b) and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, 10782(c)
The WCJ has discretion to re-designate an expedited hearing as a mandatory settlement conference or continue the matter if the issues are not appropriate for expedited determination.
From the decision · page 3(6) Any other issues requiring an expedited hearing and determination as prescribed in rules and regulations of the administrative director. (Lab. Code, § 5502(b).)
Rolda v. Pitney Bowes, Inc. (2001) 66 Cal. Comp. Cases 241, 247 (Appeals Board en banc)
Rolda v. Pitney Bowes, Inc. (2001) 66 Cal. Comp. Cases 241, 247 (Appeals Board en banc)
Medical reporting from Drs. Lamm and Larson is required for discussion of causation regarding psychiatric injury and temporary disability.
From the decision · page 4The disputed issues of compensability of injury to the psychiatric system and entitlement to temporary disability based thereon is deferred pending further medical reporting from both Marcia G. Lamm, Ph.D., and Douglas W. Larson, Ph.D., for discussion of causation in accordance with Rolda v. Pitney Bowes. Inc. (2001) 66 Cal. Comp. Cases 241, 247 (Appeals Board en banc); the issues of whether applicant sustained compensable injuries to her neurological system and/or her circadian system are deferred.
What proof carried it
The evidence the panel weighed, by kind.
The expedited hearing was not appropriate for deciding the issues of neurological and circadian system injuries.
From the decision · page 4In light of the fact that the issues submitted for decision included issues not properly tried at an expedited hearing, it is appropriate that the issues of whether applicant sustained an industrial injury to her neurological system in the form of tremors and/or to her circadian system in the form of a sleep disorder be deferred.
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.