What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Board considered the attorney's time, effort, care, experience, skill, results, and the complexity of the issues, and found the requested fee reasonable and supported by the record.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant's attorney produced a thorough answer to defendant's petition for writ of review and achieved a good result for his client.
Favours Applicant prevailed
Supported the reasonableness and fairness of the requested attorney's fee.
Defendant did not claim that the hourly rate, itemized time spent, or total fee requested by applicant's attorney was unreasonable.
Favours Applicant prevailed
Lack of substantive objection to the fee request supported awarding the full amount requested.
Costs claimed by applicant's attorney were substantiated by bills, receipts, and checks, and defendant's objection was based only on personal opinion, not substantial evidence.
Favours Applicant prevailed
Supported awarding the full amount of costs requested.