What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration deniedp. 2
Petition for Reconsideration of Findings and Award dated 4/27/2021
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
WCJ's report cures any defect in articulating rationale; vocational expert's opinion not substantial evidence because it relied on impermissible factors (age, pre-injury skills) and incorrect legal theories
From the decision · page 3Applicant petitions for reconsideration contending, “The WCJ failed to engage in any analysis and articulate any rationale that supports the WCJ's conclusion that the vocational evidence did not rebut the PDRS.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant sustained injury AOE/COE to left wrist on 7/5/16 while employed as farm laborer; no injury to left hand and fingers