What the panel ordered
Findings of Fact issued by the WCJ on May 19, 2022, affirmed after reconsideration.
Petition for Reconsideration granted and decision after reconsideration issued affirming the WCJ's Findings of Fact.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
From the decision · page 1Here, the WCJ found that applicant had dual employment with DTL Logistics, Inc. Texas and DTL Logistics, Inc., California. We agree. As set forth in Kowalski:
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant's credible testimony that he believed he was employed by DTL Logistics, Inc. California and was unaware of the Texas entity.
Favours Applicant prevailed
Supported the finding of dual employment as the applicant was working for the benefit of both entities.