What the panel ordered
Petition for reconsideration dismissed for failure to state grounds and cite record specifically.
Applicant seeks reconsideration of the Amended Findings and Award issued by the WCJ on March 18, 2021, which found injury arising out of employment and entitlement to permanent disability, future medical treatment, and attorneys' fees.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition failed to state grounds for reconsideration or cite the record specifically, warranting dismissal under Labor Code section 5902 and WCAB Rules 10945 and 10972.
From the decision · page 3Cal.Wrk.Comp. LEXIS 8] (writ den.); Hall v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1984) 49 Cal.Comp.Cases 253 [1984 Cal.Wrk.Comp. LEXIS 3315] (writ den.); Green v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1980) 45 Cal.Comp.Cases 564 [1980 Cal.Wrk.Comp. LEXIS 3319] (writ den.); if it fails to fairly state all of the material evidence, including that not favorable to it (e.g., Addecco Employment Services v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Rios) (2005) 70 Cal.Comp.Cases 1331 [2005 Cal.Wrk.Comp. LEXIS 258] (writ den.); City of Torrance v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Moore) (2002) 67 Cal.Comp.Cases 948 [2002 Cal.Wrk.Comp. LEXIS 1414] (writ den.); or if it fails to specifically discuss the particular portion(s) of the record that support the petitioner's contentions (e.g., Moore, supra, 67 Cal.Comp.Cases at 948; Shelton v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1995) 60 Cal.Comp.Cases 70 [1995 Cal.Wrk.Comp. LEXIS 3468] (writ den.).) The Petition for Reconsideration filed herein fails to state grounds upon which reconsideration is sought or to cite with specificity to the record. Accordingly, we dismiss applicant's petition for reconsideration.