The role the physician served, and the weight the opinion carried. Physicians are named here as the decision names them; we do not score them.
otherNot substantial evidence
Diagnosed depressive disorder in 2016
No discussion of predominant causation
From the decision · page 3Although Applicant was diagnosed with a depressive disorder in 2016 by Dr. Paulette Jacome, there was no discussion by her or any other physician as to predominant causation. The only testimony at trial about the alleged psychological injury was, “He suffers from depression.” (Minutes of Hearing and Summary of Evidence, 4/20/21, p. 6, lines 2-2.5.)
PTPNot substantial evidence
Identified mild depressive disorder and chronic pain disorder associated with psychological factors
No discussion of predominant causation
From the decision · page 3Cluff identified a “mild depressive disorder” and “chronic pain disorder associated with both psychological factors and general medical condition.” (DEFT’S EX. D-2: Dr. Murakami, p. 32.) Dr. Cluff mentions this diagnosis numerous times throughout the years. (DEFT'S EX. D-2: Supra.)
QMENot substantial evidence · Physical Medicine and Rehab
Reviewed treatment records from Dr. Cluff and Dr. Jacome
No discussion of predominant causation
From the decision · page 3QME Dr. Murakami reviewed numerous treatment records from Dr. Robert Cluff, as well as the report by Dr. Jacome. Dr. Cluff’s treatment reports spanned the period of 11/23/15 through 6/24/19. (DEFT'S EX. D-2: Report, Mikiko Murakami, D.O., 6/22/20, Appendix B: Summary of Reviewed Medical Records, pp. 24-71.) In his 11/23/15 report, Dr.
QMENot reached
From the decision · page 4On 11/26/18, Applicant filed an objection to defendant’s DOR, for the purpose of taking QME Dr. Dan Azar’s deposition and to obtain a psych QME evaluation. (Objection to DOR, dated 11/21/18; EAMS Doc ID: 68722773.)