California WCABInsurance carrier
Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund
Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund is named as an insurance carrier in 5 released California WCAB decisions from 2023–2026. The disputes are Earnings / average weekly earnings (1). Defense most often ran through Tobin Lucks (2). The office that heard the most of them is Bakersfield.
- Decisions
- 5
- Years
- 2023–2026
- Issues disputed
- 1
- District offices
- 4
What they litigate
Disputed issues across the decisions this insurance carrier is named in. Every row opens the decisions it counts.
2 more firms appear in the same decisions and are not listed: we could not read which side they were on.
No employer appears often enough to name.
Where they appear
How the appealed decisions came out
These are decisions that were appealed and published — the tail of a system that mostly settles. Most claims end in a compromise and release or a stipulation and never reach a panel, so nothing below describes how this insurance carrier does its work. It describes how a set of appealed disputes came out.
Counted over 4 appealed decisions. Not this insurance carrier’s book of work.
Decisions
Newest decisions this insurance carrier is named in, each with the passage the panel turned on and a link to the official PDF.
- ADJ16790828 · 2026-02-02 · Oakland District OfficeReconsideration / removaldefendant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.3On the contrary, the Appeals Board's Opinion and Order rescinded the Findings and Order issued by the WCJ. Accordingly, it is not a "final" decision and defendant's Petition for Reconsideration will be dismissed. We will also deny the petition to the extent it seeks removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy rarely exercised by the Appeals Board. (Cortez v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 596, 599, fn. 5 [71 Cal.Comp.Cases 155]; Kleemann v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 274, 280, fn. 2 [70 Cal.Comp.Cases 133].) The Appeals Board will grant removal only if the petitioner shows that substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will result if removal is not granted. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10955(a); see also Cortez, supra; Kleemann, supra.) Also, the petitioner must demonstrate that reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy if a final decision adverse to the petitioner ultimately issues. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10955(a).) Here, for the reasons stated in the WCJ's report, we are not persuaded that substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will result if removal is denied and/or that reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy if the matter ultimately proceeds to a final decision adverse to petitioner.
The petition for removal was denied because the petitioner failed to show substantial prejudice or irreparable harm and reconsideration was an adequate remedy.
Official decision · page 3 → - ADJ12545208 · 2025-06-06 · Anaheim District OfficeReconsideration / removaldefendant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.1We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Removal and the contents of the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record and based upon the WCJ's analysis of the merits of petitioner's arguments in the WCJ's report, we will deny removal.
The Appeals Board denied the petition because the petitioner failed to show substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied, and reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy.
Official decision · page 1 → - ADJ11236899 · 2023-10-17 · Bakersfield District OfficeReconsideration / removaldefendant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.1OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendant seeks reconsideration of the Findings of Fact and Orders issued by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in this matter on July 26, 2023.
The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration and deferred the final decision pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
Official decision · page 1 →
Also recorded as
The same insurance carrier is printed several ways across the decisions, and all of them were counted as one. This is every spelling behind the figures above.
- UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND
- Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund
- UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT FUND
Is this your company and something here is wrong? Tell us and we will fix it. Every figure on this page is a count of released decisions this insurance carrier is named in, and the decisions themselves are listed above with the passage each turned on.
Also on this
Private workspace
Your case already resembles someone else’s. Find whose.
Paste the dispute. The extractor builds the factors, the search finds the decisions the same facts won, and the matter stays saved. Free account.